Archive for category The Obama Agenda

Obamacare Preview: Wrap Up and Get Lost

Growing up, I watched a lot of British comedies.  From Monty Python to “The Young Ones,” I was an avid fan (and still am) of dry, British wit.  One of the best of those shows was “The Two Ronnies” starring Ronnie Barker and Ronnie Corbett.  They had a special gift for playing with the English language that was absolutely hilarious and they often engaged in social commentary.  Here is a fine example (from 1975) of both which gives us a quick glimpse into and concise wrap up of the future of Obamacare…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Is Al Gore’s STUNNING Villa/Mansion Green?

One shouldn’t have to listen to Al Gore to know he is a hypocrite, the man has it written ALL OVER HIS FACE!  He has the face of a guilty hypocrite seeking to cover up personal ambitions.  I don’t trust him in the least when he says all the profits he has made off of global warming issues have gone to charity, creating awareness….

Read here.

By the way, if you want a good laugh, I found this video on the same page:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Tags: , ,

Is There an Obama Sex Scandal Being Covered Up?

There was a “breaking news” article posted on Facebook by Positively Republican from the National Enquirer about an Obama sex scandal.  Yeah, I know it is from the Enquirer, but they were right about John Edwards, and the strange thing is, now you can’t only not pull up this article by clicking on the link, but you can’t even pull up National Enquirer by visiting their website.  http://nationalenquirer.com

Google “national enquirer” and you will not even be able to pull up their website by clicking on the link in Google.  This is NOT a coincidence that the Enquirer’s website has been SHUT DOWN!  Of course I could be wrong, but a high traffic website like theirs doesn’t just go under construction like that without have a redirect.  Today it was working just fine.  There is some fishy stuff going on here.

When I first looked at this posting I thought “more stuff to be conspiracy minded about” but when I clicked on the link, that 199 people on Facebook had already read the article from, but a blank page came up, I thought something didn’t look right.  Then I realized that the url wasn’t redirecting to the the main website.  I then tried to go to their main page but the whole National Enquirer site is shut down.   I then did a Google search and when the National Enquirer link comes up in Google, it takes you to a weird url.

Of course I am not certain that there is a cover up going on, but it just looks fishy.  If anyone happens to find anything information on this, please post in the comment section.

Update: A few have said that the link to the Enquirer website is working fine for them, please comment below and let me know if it is working for you, or no.

The first time I have been able to read of this article is on Solid Principles’ blog: http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/enquirer-exclusive-obama-cheating-scandal-shocking-new-reports/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Tags: ,

Romney on Romneycare: “I Stand for the Things I Believe In”

Mitt talks about the things he believes in when it comes to health care and points out differences between MA health care and Obamacare.  Although there are some similarities, those things that are similar are things that Republicans in the house and Senate were okay with.  The differences are stark and when one really dives in to understanding them, they find that one is a socialist plan and one is a Conservative free marketing plan without a “Public Option.”

RomneycareThere are obvious similarities between Obamacare and what you did in Massachusetts. Do you acknowledge that what you did in Massachusetts has become a model for nation under Obama, whether you wanted it to or not?

And there you have it: the primaries may be more than two years away but he’s already in prime talking point form.

I can’t speak for what the president has done. I don’t know what he looks at… If what was done at the state level, they applied at the federal level, they made a mistake. It was not designed for the nation.

I stand for the things I believe in. I don’t know what the politics are of it.

Jonathan Gruber advised both you and Obama on health care. He told me that you are “the one person who deserves the most credit for the national plan we ended up with.” Is that a title you’re willing to accept?

[Laughs.] I think you’ve already heard my answer on that.

Do you think the Republicans in Congress made a mistake by using Obama’s desire for Republican votes as leverage to align the plan more closely with conservative views? For political reasons, he was almost desperate at first to get bipartisan support for the bill.

I think what President Obama wanted was Republicans to vote for an extremely ideologically big-government plan. And Republicans weren’t going to do that….

But he was elected president, right? Wasn’t there room within those negotiations for Republicans to push his plan to the right if they chose to play ball?

Republicans put forward several pieces of legislation to reform health care, and those were rejected by the president in favor of the Pelosi-Reid plan.

Former Bush speechwriter David Frum wrote the following: “We do know that the gap between [Obama's plan] and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.” Is it fair to say that the new national plan has conservative roots, even if you disagree with it being imposed on a national level?

Let’s see, I can’t think of a great metaphor. Maybe Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: they both have two arms and two legs, but they’re very different creatures…there’s simply an enormous difference when you have one plan that imposes massive tax hikes and another that does not. [There's] a huge difference with a plan that dramatically cuts Medicare Advantage and one that does not impose a new burden on senior citizens.

Those are real differences, but aren’t they measures designed to control costs and pay for the plan? The president’s plan has cost controls that the Massachusetts plan didn’t need–tax increases on people earning over $200,000 a year, reductions in wasteful Medicare spending. In Massachusetts, you could just repurpose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds to pay for it. But that doesn’t work on the national level. So it seems a little disingenuous to call the Democrats fiscally irresponsible, then criticize the parts of the plan that are designed to make it fiscally responsible.

But you see, we go back to the initial premise. I reject the idea of a federal mandate imposed on states and individuals. If you open the door to the federal government, then it leads to all sorts of unattractive elements, such as raising taxes and cutting Medicare. If instead one said at the federal level, “We’re going to give resource flexibility to states to use money they’re already receiving as a way to help the poor buy insurance,” that says, “All right, we’re using funds that have already been allocated, we’re letting states create their own plans, and we’ll see how that works. And we’ll learn from the experience.” That’s the idea of states as the laboratories of democracy. What we’ve gotten into by opening the door to a federally imposed plan is the creation of the Mr. Hyde monster.

Obviously concerned how this might play with GOP audiences when the presidential primary season rolls around, Romney stuck to the PR script and struck a stoic pose:

Many political pundits believe that the passage of Obama’s health-care plan and the related animosity among Republicans toward what you did in Massachusetts has greatly diminished your chances of winning the Republican nomination if you run for president in 2012.

I stand for the things I believe in. I don’t know what the politics are of it.

Original article here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Tags: , , ,

Army Seizes Computer and Revokes Pentagon Access For Challenger To Obama’s Eligibility

ARMY FLIGHT SURGEON FACING COURT MARTIAL OVER REFUSAL TO OBEY ORDERS

By Sharon Rondeau

Lt. Colonel Terry Lakin

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who has been informed that he will face "serious charges" for refusing orders from his Army chain of command based on Obama's refusal to prove that he is a "natural born Citizen"

(Apr. 13, 2010) — The American Patriot Foundation is reporting that Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, the Army flight surgeon who has refused to follow any orders until Barack Obama produces proof of eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. military, has been read his Miranda rights and informed that he would soon be “charged with serious crimes.”

On Monday, April 12, Lakin was ordered to report to Ft. Campbell, KY in preparation for what would have been his second deployment to Afghanistan.  The report states that “Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.”

On March 30, 2010, Lakin had released a letter to Obama explaining his decision and why Obama needed to release proof of his eligibility to serve as President.  Lakin, in his 18th year of uniformed service in the Army, also released a video message which stated that the burden of proof as to whether or not Obama is a “natural born Citizen” should be placed on Obama himself, not members of the military.

Dr. Alan Keyes, 2008 presidential candidate and plaintiff in a lawsuit currently being appealed in against Obama for the same reason, stated that Lt. Col. Lakin’s decision to refuse to obey further orders “speaks to the deep seriousness” of Obama’s flaunting of the U.S. Constitution.

Dr. James David Manning, pastor of ATLAH Ministries in Harlem, NY, urged “the patriots in America, the Tea Party people, the Republicans, conservatives, the Rush Limbaughs and others” to support Lt. Col. Lakin and Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick III to prevent the further erosion of rights for all American citizens and to oppose Obama’s “spirit, his name, his Marxism, and his hatred for America.”  Dr. Manning also referenced the military’s initial response to Lakin’s refusal to follow orders, which was to imply that Lakin was mentally ill and suggested that he have a “brain scan.”

Dr. Manning claims he has evidence that Obama never attended Columbia University in New York but instead worked for the CIA during the years 1981-83 and that Columbia fabricated paperwork to provide a history for him.  A trial will be held on the ATLAH premises on May 14-19, 2010, about which Manning has released numerous video announcements and flyers.  The American Grand Jury organization will be assisting in that effort.

Donations can be made to Lakin’s Legal Defense Fund here.

Original article here.

Video added by the Editor

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Tags: , ,