<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Competent Conservative &#187; Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecompetentconservative.com/tag/fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com</link>
	<description>Mitt Romney For President 2012!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Romney on Fox News: &#8220;If The Truth is Standard, We Win&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/romney-on-fox-news-if-the-truth-is-standared-we-win/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/romney-on-fox-news-if-the-truth-is-standared-we-win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=4449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney on Fox News: &#8220;If The Truth is Standard, We Win&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><h3>Romney on Fox News: &#8220;If The Truth is Standard, We Win&#8221;</h3>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1424219145001&amp;w=620&amp;h=350"></script></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317";
/* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0825149736";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-4449"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Fromney-on-fox-news-if-the-truth-is-standared-we-win%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/romney-on-fox-news-if-the-truth-is-standared-we-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Interviews Romney, Governor Bob McDonnell Endorses Mitt</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-interviews-romney-governor-bob-mcdonnell-endorses-mitt/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-interviews-romney-governor-bob-mcdonnell-endorses-mitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Endoresments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endorsements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney was interviewed on Fox &#38; Friends this morning and Governor Bob McDonnell offered his endorsement on the name program.  Here are a few videos: Governor Romney&#8217;s Interview: These next two videos are interviews with Governor Bob McDonnell endorsing Mitt:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>Mitt Romney was interviewed on Fox &amp; Friends this morning and Governor Bob McDonnell offered his endorsement on the name program.  Here are a few videos:</p>
<p>Governor Romney&#8217;s Interview:<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1403628399001&#038;w=630&#038;h=360"></script><br />
<br />
These next two videos are interviews with Governor Bob McDonnell endorsing Mitt:<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1404680854001&#038;w=630&#038;h=360"></script><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1403714944001&#038;w=630&#038;h=360"></script><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317";
/* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0825149736";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3952"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Ffox-news-interviews-romney-governor-bob-mcdonnell-endorses-mitt%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-interviews-romney-governor-bob-mcdonnell-endorses-mitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Debate: Romney on Fixing Social Security, Medicare</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-debate-romney-on-fixing-social-security-medicare/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-debate-romney-on-fixing-social-security-medicare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1395836045001&#038;w=630&#038;h=360"></script><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317";
/* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0825149736";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3795"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Ffox-news-debate-romney-on-fixing-social-security-medicare%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-debate-romney-on-fixing-social-security-medicare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Poll For The Republican Nomination Shows Romney at 40% With a 25% Lead</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-poll-for-the-republican-nomination-shows-romney-at-40-with-a-25-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-poll-for-the-republican-nomination-shows-romney-at-40-with-a-25-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News 2012 GOP Nomination Poll Mitt Romney 40% [23%] (22%) {20%} [23%] (22%) {26%} [26%] Rick Santorum 15% [4%] (2%) {3%} [3%] (4%) {4%} [4%] Newt Gingrich 14% [36%] (23%) {12%} [11%] (3%) {9%} [9%] Ron Paul 13% [12%] (8%) {9%} [6%] (8%) {10%} [10%] Rick Perry 6% [8%] (7%) {10%} [19%] (29%) Too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><blockquote><p><strong><a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2012/01/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican.html">Fox News 2012 GOP Nomination Poll</a></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Mitt Romney 40%</strong> [23%] (22%) {20%} [<strong>23%</strong>] (22%) {26%} [26%]</li>
<li>Rick Santorum 15% [4%] (2%) {3%} [3%] (4%) {4%} [4%]</li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 14% [<strong>36%</strong>]<strong> </strong>(<strong>23%</strong>)<strong> </strong>{12%} [11%] (3%) {9%} [9%]</li>
<li>Ron Paul 13% [12%] (8%) {9%} [6%] (8%) {10%} [10%]</li>
<li>Rick Perry 6% [8%] (7%) {10%} [19%] (<strong>29%</strong>)</li>
<li>Too soon to say 4% [6%] (7%) {11%} [5%] (6%) {8%} [7%]</li>
<li>Don’t know 2% [2%] (5%) {5%} [7%] (10%) {9%} [13%]</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Which Republican presidential candidate do you think is most qualified to manage the economy?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Mitt Romney 44%</strong></li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 17%</li>
<li>Ron Paul 10%</li>
<li>Rick Santorum 8%</li>
<li>Rick Perry 3%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Which Republican presidential candidate do you think would do the best job working with Congress?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Mitt Romney 35%</strong></li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 28%</li>
<li>Rick Santorum 10%</li>
<li>Ron Paul 8%</li>
<li>Rick Perry 4%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>If _________________ were the Republican presidential nominee, which of the following comes closest to your view? Would he be: The best candidate to represent the party; Maybe not the best, but good enough; A bad choice to represent the party?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Mitt Romney</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The best candidate to represent the party 36%</li>
<li><strong>Maybe not the best, but good enough 50%</strong></li>
<li>A bad choice to represent the party 8%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Rick Santorum</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The best candidate to represent the party 20%</li>
<li><strong>Maybe not the best, but good enough 52%</strong></li>
<li>A bad choice to represent the party 16%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Newt Gingrich</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The best candidate to represent the party 19%</li>
<li><strong>Maybe not the best, but good enough 48%</strong></li>
<li>A bad choice to represent the party 27%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Which kind of Republican presidential candidate do you think would be more likely to beat Barack Obama in November?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>A more moderate Republican who will appeal to independents 49%</strong></li>
<li>A more conservative Republican who will provide the sharpest contrast with Obama 43%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>When thinking about the backgrounds of the presidential candidates, which comes closer to your opinion of someone who has run businesses as a consultant and invested in them as a venture capitalist? Are you more likely to think:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>That’s a good thing because he has the experience and knowledge about finance and job creation. 54%</strong></li>
<li>That’s a bad thing because he is too close to Wall Street and the greed that caused the financial collapse. 30%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Which Republican candidate do you think has the best chance of beating Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Mitt Romney 63% (37%)</strong></li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 9% (18%)</li>
<li>Ron Paul 7% (2%)</li>
<li>Rick Santorum 4% (0%)</li>
<li>Rick Perry 1% (5%)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>If your favorite candidate doesn’t win the Republican presidential nomination will you definitely still vote for the Republican candidate in November against Barack Obama, will you probably vote for the Republican candidate, or will you not vote for the Republican in November if your favorite candidate doesn’t win the nomination?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Definitely still vote for Republican 63%</strong></li>
<li>Probably still vote for Republican 24%</li>
<li>Not vote for Republican 8%</li>
<li>Vote for Obama 2%</li>
<li>Don’t know 4%</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Survey of 365 Republican primary voters was conducted by Anderson Robbins Research (D)/Shaw &amp; Company Research (R) January 12-14, 2012.  The margin of error is +/- 5 percentage points.  Results from the poll conducted <strong><a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/12/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican.html" target="_blank">December 5-7, 2011</a></strong> are in square brackets.  Results from the poll conducted <a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/11/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican.html" target="_blank"><strong>November 13-15, 2011</strong></a> are in parentheses.  Results from the poll conducted <a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/10/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican.html" target="_blank"><strong>October 23-25, 2011</strong></a> are in curly brackets.  Results from the poll conducted <a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/09/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican_28.html"><strong>September 25-27, 2011</strong></a> are in square brackets.  Results from the poll conducted <strong><a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/09/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-republican.html">August 29-31, 2011</a></strong> are in parentheses.  Results from the poll conducted <a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/08/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-presidential.html"><strong>August 7-9, 2011</strong></a> are in curly brackets.  Results from the poll conducted <strong><a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2011/07/poll-watch-fox-news-2012-presidential.html">July 17-19, 2011</a></strong> are in square brackets.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>–<em><strong>Data compilation and analysis courtesy of <a href="http://argojournal.blogspot.com/" target="_self">The Argo Journal</a></strong></em><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317";
/* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0825149736";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3769"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Ffox-news-poll-for-the-republican-nomination-shows-romney-at-40-with-a-25-lead%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-news-poll-for-the-republican-nomination-shows-romney-at-40-with-a-25-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News Contributor Stuart Varney Defends Bain Capital and Romney</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-new-contributor-stuart-varney-defends-bain-capital-and-romney/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-new-contributor-stuart-varney-defends-bain-capital-and-romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Varney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox news has been doing their own homework and research on Romney&#8217;s record at Bain and have found that Gingrich&#8217;s attacks are completely untrue.  Stuart defends Capitalism, and Bain in particular, while drawing out little known details surrounding AmPad and Dade International, which happen to be the subject of Newt&#8217;s latest attacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>Fox news has been doing their own homework and research on Romney&#8217;s record at Bain and have found that Gingrich&#8217;s attacks are completely untrue.  Stuart defends Capitalism, and Bain in particular, while drawing out little known details surrounding AmPad and Dade International, which happen to be the subject of Newt&#8217;s latest attacks.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DJLx6RtQXXg" frameborder="0" width="630" height="360"></iframe></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
 google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317"; /* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */ google_ad_slot = "0825149736"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3669"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Ffox-new-contributor-stuart-varney-defends-bain-capital-and-romney%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/fox-new-contributor-stuart-varney-defends-bain-capital-and-romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pawlenty Gives a Strong Defense of Romney Against Socialist Like Attacks By Gingrich/Perry (Video)</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/pawlenty-gives-a-strong-defense-of-romney-against-socialist-like-attacks-by-gingrichperry-video/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/pawlenty-gives-a-strong-defense-of-romney-against-socialist-like-attacks-by-gingrichperry-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney vs Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defends Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pawlenty Gives a Strong Defense of Against Socialist Like Attacks By Gingrich/Perry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/1376583631001/attacks-on-romney-embracing-the-democrats-message" target="_blank">Pawlenty Gives a Strong Defense of Against Socialist Like Attacks By Gingrich/Perry</a></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1376583631001&amp;w=630&amp;h=360"></script><br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317";
/* 468x60, created 8/27/09 */
google_ad_slot = "0825149736";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3367"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Fpawlenty-gives-a-strong-defense-of-romney-against-socialist-like-attacks-by-gingrichperry-video%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/pawlenty-gives-a-strong-defense-of-romney-against-socialist-like-attacks-by-gingrichperry-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Sununu Says Newt Gingrich Has a &#8216;Truth Problem&#8217;, Defends Romney (Video)</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/john-sununu-says-newt-gingrich-has-a-truth-problem-defends-romney-video/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/john-sununu-says-newt-gingrich-has-a-truth-problem-defends-romney-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sununu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=3055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent polls out today showing Mitt Romney with a commanding and expanding lead in New Hampshire, Gingrich and Huntsman have taken to false attacks against the front runner in a desperate attempt to give themselves a higher boost before the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, January 10th.  Huntsman obviously has a jealously problem.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://thecompetentconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ScreenShot065.jpg"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-3066" title="John-Sununu-Fox-News" src="http://thecompetentconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ScreenShot065.jpg" alt="John Sununu Mitt Romney" width="615" height="321" /></a></p>
<p>With the recent polls out today showing Mitt Romney with a commanding and expanding lead in New Hampshire, Gingrich and Huntsman have taken to false attacks against the front runner in a desperate attempt to give themselves a higher boost before the New Hampshire primary on Tuesday, January 10th.  Huntsman obviously has a jealously problem.  His attacks are unfounded, and he is irrelevant, so I won&#8217;t dwell on him. New Gringrich however has a personal vendetta toward Romney and is on an venomous war path to assassinate his character while, in a way reserved for the most grand hypocrites among us, is not only lying about Governor Romney&#8217;s record, but is attacking him on the basis of a state sponsored individual mandate while Gingrich himself supported mandates at the National level.</p>
<p>Former NH Gov John Sununu, a Romney supporter, didn’t mince words when he spoke today with FOX News’ Martha MacCallum about Gingrich, Huntsman, and Santorum:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1369822072001&amp;w=640&amp;h=370"></script><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
 google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4706507631764317"; /* 468x60, created 8/31/09 */ google_ad_slot = "4351033967"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3055"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Fjohn-sununu-says-newt-gingrich-has-a-truth-problem-defends-romney-video%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/john-sununu-says-newt-gingrich-has-a-truth-problem-defends-romney-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney Interviewed in Iowa by Carl Cameron</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/mitt-romney-interviewed-in-iowa-by-carl-cameron/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/mitt-romney-interviewed-in-iowa-by-carl-cameron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 23:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Cameron]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=2664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=963604521001&#038;w=666&#038;h=363"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2664"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Fmitt-romney-interviewed-in-iowa-by-carl-cameron%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/mitt-romney-interviewed-in-iowa-by-carl-cameron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Absorb&#8221; Terror Attack Comment: DHS Chief Explains, Woodward Calls it &#8220;Bizarre&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/2264/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/2264/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Obama Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absorbe Terrorist Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavalier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commander In Chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department Of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foundation Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Of Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glass Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O Reilly Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office Interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oval Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terror Threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorist Attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=2264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on Wednesday defended a much-discussed remark recently made by President Obama that the U.S. &#8220;can absorb a terrorist attack,&#8221; saying the U.S. has taken a number of actions to enhance security but &#8220;we can&#8217;t seal the United States under a glass dome.&#8221; &#8220;I think what he meant is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div>
<div>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/sites/politics.blogs.foxnews.com/files/Sept_7_2010_Woodward_bookcoverAP.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="115" height="175" />Department of Homeland Security Secretary <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/janet-napolitano.htm">Janet Napolitano</a> on Wednesday defended a much-discussed remark recently made by  President Obama that the U.S. &#8220;can absorb a terrorist attack,&#8221; saying  the U.S. has taken a number of actions to enhance security but &#8220;we can&#8217;t  seal the United States under a glass dome.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I think what he meant is that we are resilient, we have absorbed  terrorist attacks, we&#8217;ve absorbed a lot of other damage to our country  and we always come back and will come back again,&#8221; Napolitano told Fox  News. &#8220;But again if someone were to get through, if an attack were to  get through, we would recover efficiently and go after the attacker and  come back as a country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama made the statement to author Bob Woodward in his new book &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Wars.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We will do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even  the biggest attack ever, that ever took place on our soil, we absorbed  it, and we are stronger,&#8221; Obama is quoted as telling Woodward.</p>
<p>Some critics took the comment to mean that the U.S. isn&#8217;t aggressive  or ready enough for an attack. Even before the book was released,  conservatives attacked Obama&#8217;s use of the word &#8220;absorb.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;His statement demonstrates our commander-in-chief&#8217;s cavalier and frightening approach to national security,&#8221; reads <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/the-heritage-foundation.htm">The Heritage Foundation</a> web site. Woodward added, &#8220;It would be like the head of Goldman Sachs  going out and saying we can absorb another financial crisis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed, Woodward writes in &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Wars&#8221; that he was &#8220;surprised&#8221; by the comment made during an Oval Office interview.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, he told Fox News&#8217; &#8220;The O&#8217;Reilly Factor&#8221; that he thought the remarks was &#8220;bizarre.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I went to check to see if he had said that before. Turns out, he has not,&#8221; said Woodward.</p>
<p>But Woodward said he understands Obama&#8217;s frame of mind given the constant terror threat faced by the U.S.</p>
<p>&#8220;The president is living in a sea of warnings about future terrorist  attacks,&#8221; Woodward said. &#8220;He&#8217;s trying to be realistic and lay the ground  work for something that is going to happen. We&#8217;ve been lucky.&#8221;</p>
<p>Napolitano&#8217;s clarification comes as U.S. intelligence officials  examine whether alleged terror plots targeting European cities signal a  new threat to the United States. The homeland security secretary would  not speak specifically to threats on the U.S. or western interests  abroad, but called <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/iraq/al-qaeda.htm">Al Qaeda</a> a &#8220;determined adversary.&#8221;</p>
<p>She added that homeland security is a shared responsibility that  includes not just the U.S. government but citizens and local law  enforcement.</p>
<p>Watch Woodward&#8217;s interview with O&#8217;Reilly below.</p>
<p><script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4352734&amp;w=466&amp;h=320" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript> <script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4352736&amp;w=466&amp;h=320" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript></p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/09/29/obamas-absorb-terror-attack-comment-dhs-chief-explains-woodward-calls-it-bizarre#ixzz10xEcqWFk">http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/09/29/obamas-absorb-terror-attack-comment-dhs-chief-explains-woodward-calls-it-bizarre#ixzz10xEcqWFk</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-2264"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2F2264%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/2264/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll Watch: Mitt Romney Strongest Candidate to Go Against Obama in 2012</title>
		<link>http://thecompetentconservative.com/poll-watch-mitt-romney-strongest-candidate-to-go-against-obama-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://thecompetentconservative.com/poll-watch-mitt-romney-strongest-candidate-to-go-against-obama-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Members Of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresh Start]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margin Of Error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Members Of Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion Dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parentheses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Party Id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Percentage Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Registered Voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney vs Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecompetentconservative.com/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News/Opinion Dynamics 2012 Presidential Survey Barack Obama 47% Mitt Romney 35% Barack Obama 55% Sarah Palin 31% Barack Obama 53% Newt Gingrich 29% Barack Obama 48% Candidate from Tea Party Movement 23% Among Independents Barack Obama 43% Mitt Romney 28% Barack Obama 56% Sarah Palin 24% Barack Obama 53% Newt Gingrich 23% Barack Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><h3 id="post-26118"><a title="Permanent Link to Poll Watch: Fox News/Opinion Dynamics 2012 Presidential Survey" rel="bookmark" href="http://race42008.com/2010/01/21/poll-watch-fox-newsopinion-dynamics-2012-presidential-survey/"><br />
</a></h3>
<div>
<blockquote><p><strong><a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/012110_poll.pdf');" href="http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/012110_poll.pdf" target="_blank">Fox News/Opinion Dynamics 2012 Presidential Survey</a></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 47%</strong></li>
<li>Mitt Romney 35%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 55%</strong></li>
<li>Sarah Palin 31%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 53%</strong></li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 29%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 48%</strong></li>
<li>Candidate from Tea Party Movement 23%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Among Independents</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 43%</strong></li>
<li>Mitt Romney 28%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 56%</strong></li>
<li>Sarah Palin 24%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 53%</strong></li>
<li>Newt Gingrich 23%</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Barack Obama 43%</strong></li>
<li>Candidate from Tea Party Movement 26%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>If the 2012 presidential election were held today, would you definitely vote to re-elect Barack Obama, probably vote to re-elect Obama, probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Definitely vote to re-elect Obama 23% (26%)</li>
<li>Probably vote to re-elect Obama 20% (17%)</li>
<li><strong>Probably vote for someone else 11% (14%)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Definitely vote for someone else 36% (34%)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Among Independents</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Definitely vote to re-elect Obama 14% (20%)</li>
<li>Probably vote to re-elect Obama 18% (15%)</li>
<li><strong>Probably vote for someone else 13% (18%)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Definitely vote for someone else 31% (30%)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Among Obama Voters</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Definitely vote to re-elect Obama 43% (53%)</strong></li>
<li><strong>Probably vote to re-elect Obama 35% (28%)</strong></li>
<li>Probably vote for someone else 6% (7%)</li>
<li>Definitely vote for someone else 3% (3%)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Who do you want to win this year’s congressional elections — the Democrats or the Republicans?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Democrats 38%</strong></li>
<li>Republicans 37%</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Do you think it would be good or bad for the country if all the current members of Congress were voted out of office — including your own representative — and all new people were elected this November to get a fresh start?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Good 43%</li>
<li><strong>Bad 44%</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Among Independents</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Good 50%</strong></li>
<li>Bad 35%</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Survey of 900 registered voters was conducted January 12-13, 2010. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points. Results from the poll conducted October 13-14, 2009 are in parentheses. Party ID breakdown: 39% Democrat; 34% Republican; 20% Independent.</em></p></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-1768"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fthecompetentconservative.com%2Fpoll-watch-mitt-romney-strongest-candidate-to-go-against-obama-in-2012%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=recommend&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px;margin-top:5px;"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecompetentconservative.com/poll-watch-mitt-romney-strongest-candidate-to-go-against-obama-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

